London 2012 and that Hindley image
Monday, August 25th, 2008 at 7:42 am
Hello - welcome to my website.
On my blog I write about marketing, public relations and digital communications. To keep up-to-date with my posts you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed or sign-up to receive blog posts by email.
Thanks for visiting and I hope you find my site useful.
Amind the positive buzz around yesterday’s handover of the Olympic host city status to London, there was inevitably going to be a sour note somewhere.
From the rolling news coverage last night and this morning, it looks like the use of a shot of a portrait of Moors murderer Myra Hindley within a promotional video shown at London 2012 event in Beijing last night is that sour note.
BBC News is showing footage of the video being played at the party. The shot appears for a fraction of a second as part of a sequence of images of London and appeared because the portrait was being displayed in a gallery, presumably being used to represent London’s cultural scene in the video.
There’s already been denouncement of the use of the image by everyone you’d expect, including London mayor Boris Johnson and Prime Minister Gordon Brown (although the latter not yet on his snazzy new website).
To me this is just a slip-up, pure and simple. And not a massive one at that. It won’t do any lasting damage to London 2012’s reputation.
This does highlight the ever increasing intensity of scrutiny that London 2012 will be under. If a half second glimpse of an inappropriate image can be picked up in this way, imagine the impact of a more fundamental difficulty. This just demonstrates the importance of a planned approach to issues management, helping organisations take a wider view to their interactions with the world around them than individuals within the organisation would necessarily take.
Taking a different example, if I’d been responsible for commissioning this leaflet, I’d have been pretty disappointed with myself for not spotting the incorrect skyline image. However I’d be even more ashamed of not admitting the mistake right away rather than trying to argue against a pretty obvious problem.
At an individual level as marketing or public relations professionals commmisioning any sort of promotional material, we have to take responsibility for the content that we commission. While we sub-contract degrees of responsibility to designers, producers, cameramen and the link, we must still retain overall responsibility, and that includes maintaining a mental filter for potential slip-ups like this.
To be able to apply this mental filter effectively we must have a considered and informed understanding of the environment that we operate in, its cultural and political sensitivities, as well as good dose of common sense to boot.
Tags: beijing, london, london+2012, Marketing, public+relations
Comments on “London 2012 and that Hindley image”
Leave your comment
Latest links 
Links to interesting information I've spotted recently on the web:
- Grasping the New Communication Nettle
- Social reporting at Cisco08 Public Sector Summit
- Recession proofing the brand called YOU
- Butt Out IT! Facebook “Productivity Loss” Is No Concern of Yours - Brian Prentice — A member of the Gartner Blog Network
- How Rich Is Your Communication In A Conflict?
- Making Gmail Your Gateway to the Web
- Hiscox: the benefits of bravery
- FAQ’s about Twitter Strategy and Public Relations
- The re-branding of Prince Charles
- The Ethics of Ghost-Writing in Social Media
- The World Does Not Need Journalists
- Tabbloid Turns Feeds into a Personal Magazine
- Creating an internal Social Media Forum
- Warning blogger relations mustnt be rushed!
- Councils told: embrace social networks
Latest bookmarks 
My most recent bookmarks from del.icio.us:
- 33 Free Tools to Make Your Website Better | FutureNow's GrokDotCom / Marketing Optimization Blog
- MMA study finds increase in mobile marketing receptiveness
- If RSS Is Niche Media, Why Use It?
- New Media Knowledge - Rough Guide to: Social Media and the Law
- UK Kids and Teens Communicate Nonstop
- Understanding and Aligning the Value of Social Media | FutureNow's GrokDotCom / Marketing Optimization Blog
- weaverluke: Twitter.com
- The week that Britain's culture wars broke out | Media | The Observer
- Message in-a-Box
- Welcome to Where I Live | Where I Live
- Utilising Web 2.0 in local government
- MySpace and Facebook Fast Becoming the Leading Mobile Social Networks
- searching for the impact of empowerment report - MORI
- Demos | Publications | State of Trust
- Pew Internet: Teens, Video Games and Civics

My bookmarks
LinkedIn profile
Facebook profile


Monday, August 25th, 2008 at 9:40 am
Artists’ best work is often a reflection of a society. Briton’s don’t like this particular reflection, but that’s the point. It’s not inappropriate; it’s art. Your point about scrutiny is correct. But I do hope that 2012 will reflect true British culture, not just a collection of carefully stage-managed, commercial aspects.
Monday, August 25th, 2008 at 10:15 am
Thanks for the comment Sherrilynne.
I think the image probably is inappropriate in the context of its purpose in the video (unless the aim was to be deliberately provocative, which I doubt) - a different image could have been used in that context to show the same point. As you say, it’s not inappropriate in its context as a piece of art.
That said, creative arts and managing reputation aren’t always comfortable bedfellows…
Monday, August 25th, 2008 at 11:09 am
[...] I mentioned on Simon Wakeman’s blog this morning, artists’ best work is often a reflection of a society. Briton’s don’t like [...]