<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Not as cheap&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.simonwakeman.com/2007/12/29/not-as-cheap/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.simonwakeman.com/2007/12/29/not-as-cheap/</link>
	<description>public sector communications and marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 14:41:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Peal</title>
		<link>http://www.simonwakeman.com/2007/12/29/not-as-cheap/#comment-71079</link>
		<dc:creator>John Peal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 12:07:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simonwakeman.com/2007/12/29/not-as-cheap/#comment-71079</guid>
		<description>Yes, it&#039;s elegantly done. It reminded me of another piece of clever copy (a strapline actually), which DID use a low price strategy unlike this example. It was for Sekonda watches, which were very cheap Russian watches, just as the Swatch phenomenon hit. They used the line &#039;Beware of expensive imitations&#039;, which managed to communicate they were low cost yet still desirable.

I was on your site, Simon, because I&#039;m interested in using Wordpress as a platform for a Parish Council website and needless to say there are no funds! Thanks for the info you share on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, it&#8217;s elegantly done. It reminded me of another piece of clever copy (a strapline actually), which DID use a low price strategy unlike this example. It was for Sekonda watches, which were very cheap Russian watches, just as the Swatch phenomenon hit. They used the line &#8216;Beware of expensive imitations&#8217;, which managed to communicate they were low cost yet still desirable.</p>
<p>I was on your site, Simon, because I&#8217;m interested in using WordPress as a platform for a Parish Council website and needless to say there are no funds! Thanks for the info you share on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Wake</title>
		<link>http://www.simonwakeman.com/2007/12/29/not-as-cheap/#comment-68111</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Wake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 09:19:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simonwakeman.com/2007/12/29/not-as-cheap/#comment-68111</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m with you and Chris on this one. It&#039;s a great bit of marketing and reminds me of the Stella Artois &#039;reassuringly expensive&#039; strapline.

I&#039;m sure The Railway will also feature far fewer punch ups too!

Happy 2008,

Andy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with you and Chris on this one. It&#8217;s a great bit of marketing and reminds me of the Stella Artois &#8216;reassuringly expensive&#8217; strapline.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure The Railway will also feature far fewer punch ups too!</p>
<p>Happy 2008,</p>
<p>Andy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Marritt</title>
		<link>http://www.simonwakeman.com/2007/12/29/not-as-cheap/#comment-67998</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Marritt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 19:25:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simonwakeman.com/2007/12/29/not-as-cheap/#comment-67998</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s great, Simon. The word cheap has a powerful stigma attached to it, with the implication of poor quality as strong as the claim that it is inexpensive. 
I remember being amused when a member of my family once complained about a free gift they&#039;d got (eg, with a magazine). They said: &quot;It (the gift) was free, but it was only cheap.&quot;
That said, this is the first time I&#039;ve seen somebody actually use it to their advantage in such a subtly clever way.
PLUS it serves Shepherd Neame. It must be good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s great, Simon. The word cheap has a powerful stigma attached to it, with the implication of poor quality as strong as the claim that it is inexpensive.<br />
I remember being amused when a member of my family once complained about a free gift they&#8217;d got (eg, with a magazine). They said: &#8220;It (the gift) was free, but it was only cheap.&#8221;<br />
That said, this is the first time I&#8217;ve seen somebody actually use it to their advantage in such a subtly clever way.<br />
PLUS it serves Shepherd Neame. It must be good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.323 seconds -->
