What’s the difference between marketing and public relations?
Saturday, October 6th, 2007 at 7:58 am
Hello - welcome to my website.
On my blog I write about marketing, public relations and digital communications. To keep up-to-date with my posts you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed or sign-up to receive blog posts by email.
Thanks for visiting and I hope you find my site useful.
I use a handy little utility called 103bees to see what search terms people are using to find this site.
As well as showing raw search terms, 103bees also shows the top questions that people are searching on each week. The top question every week is always the same:
What is the difference between marketing and PR?
I’ve posted about this before, but I think there’s probably a more succinct way of explaining the difference, without resorting to a list of different definitions for the two professions:
Marketing is about changing behaviour, while public relations is about keeping or changing reputations.
The two aims work together well. Changing behaviour is a lot easier if you have a reputation that’s consistent with that behaviour; indeed I’d say that your reputation is a pre-requisite to marketing.
Similarly what you do to change people’s or organisation’s behaviours does a lot to influence your reputation, even though that may not be the aim of the marketing activity itself.
Does this way of illustrating the difference between marketing and public relations stand up, or am I glossing over too many of the subtleties?
[tags]marketing, public+relations, definitions, 103bees[/tags]
Tags: 103bees, definitions, Marketing, Public relations, public+relations
Comments on “What’s the difference between marketing and public relations?”
Leave your comment
Latest links 
Links to interesting information I've spotted recently on the web:
- Hiscox: the benefits of bravery
- FAQ’s about Twitter Strategy and Public Relations
- The re-branding of Prince Charles
- The Ethics of Ghost-Writing in Social Media
- The World Does Not Need Journalists
- Tabbloid Turns Feeds into a Personal Magazine
- Creating an internal Social Media Forum
- Warning blogger relations mustnt be rushed!
- Councils told: embrace social networks
- Communications: Some lessons from the New Deal for Communities Programme - Communities and neighbourhoods - Communities and Local Government
- e-Published: my e-book, Brands in Networks...
- Research brief links engagement, business improvement to internal use of Web 2.0
- AskPeople: Easy, quick & simple online feedback surveys, polls and questionnaire forms
- What is Social Media? eBook on Mashable
- Cook & Hopkins Social Media Report - 3rd Edition
Latest bookmarks 
My most recent bookmarks from del.icio.us:
- 33 Free Tools to Make Your Website Better | FutureNow's GrokDotCom / Marketing Optimization Blog
- MMA study finds increase in mobile marketing receptiveness
- If RSS Is Niche Media, Why Use It?
- New Media Knowledge - Rough Guide to: Social Media and the Law
- UK Kids and Teens Communicate Nonstop
- Understanding and Aligning the Value of Social Media | FutureNow's GrokDotCom / Marketing Optimization Blog
- weaverluke: Twitter.com
- The week that Britain's culture wars broke out | Media | The Observer
- Message in-a-Box
- Welcome to Where I Live | Where I Live
- Utilising Web 2.0 in local government
- MySpace and Facebook Fast Becoming the Leading Mobile Social Networks
- searching for the impact of empowerment report - MORI
- Demos | Publications | State of Trust
- Pew Internet: Teens, Video Games and Civics

My bookmarks
LinkedIn profile
Facebook profile

Tuesday, October 23rd, 2007 at 8:48 pm
I don’t agree with the distinction that “marketing is about changing behaviour, while public relations is about keeping or changing reputations”.
Neither changing behaviour nor managing reputation seems to me to be exclusive to either marketing or PR. In fact, both could be seen as core aspects of management per se.
Marketing plays a key role in changing certain aspects of behaviour - such as stimulating customers to purchase a product or service. But doesn’t PR also look to change behaviour, for example in getting government to amend legislation?
In reputational terms, I feel PR sets itself up to fail in many situations if it claims to be able to keep or change reputation. It should certainly be able to influence strategic decisions in relation to their reputational impact - but others have a real impact on reputation that is beyond the influence of PR.
PR’s ability to help organisations facilitate communications and relationships with key publics should be recognised, alongside a role in managing risk in relation to issues that could become a reputation-affecting crisis.
Anyway, I think that many of those searching for the difference between marketing and PR are probably students - who should be encouraged to reflect more deeply than being offered an easy solution by kind bloggers.
Wednesday, October 31st, 2007 at 2:36 pm
Hi Heather - thanks for the well-argued comment, far more reasoned than my attempt at a quick-fit definition.
The more I think about the difference between marketing and PR, the more I struggle.
As you’ve identified there’s so many outcomes that are common to the two professions, that I wonder what the fundamental differences are?
If there aren’t any fundamental differences, are we seeing a further convergence of the two professions?
And as for the students, I suspect you’re right. I even get emails asking about this topic!