What’s the difference between marketing and public relations?
Saturday, October 6th, 2007 at 7:58 am
Welcome to my website. On my blog I write about marketing, public relations and digital communications. To keep up-to-date with my posts you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed or sign-up to receive blog posts by email.
Thanks for visiting and I hope you enjoy my site.
I use a handy little utility called 103bees to see what search terms people are using to find this site.
As well as showing raw search terms, 103bees also shows the top questions that people are searching on each week. The top question every week is always the same:
What is the difference between marketing and PR?
I’ve posted about this before, but I think there’s probably a more succinct way of explaining the difference, without resorting to a list of different definitions for the two professions:
Marketing is about changing behaviour, while public relations is about keeping or changing reputations.
The two aims work together well. Changing behaviour is a lot easier if you have a reputation that’s consistent with that behaviour; indeed I’d say that your reputation is a pre-requisite to marketing.
Similarly what you do to change people’s or organisation’s behaviours does a lot to influence your reputation, even though that may not be the aim of the marketing activity itself.
Does this way of illustrating the difference between marketing and public relations stand up, or am I glossing over too many of the subtleties?
[tags]marketing, public+relations, definitions, 103bees[/tags]
Tags: 103bees, definitions, Marketing, Public relations, public+relations
Categories: Marketing, Public relations
RSS feed for my blog
Receive blog by email
My bookmarks on del.icio.us
My profile on LinkedIn
My profile on Facebook
Tuesday, October 23rd, 2007 at 8:48 pm
I don’t agree with the distinction that “marketing is about changing behaviour, while public relations is about keeping or changing reputations”.
Neither changing behaviour nor managing reputation seems to me to be exclusive to either marketing or PR. In fact, both could be seen as core aspects of management per se.
Marketing plays a key role in changing certain aspects of behaviour - such as stimulating customers to purchase a product or service. But doesn’t PR also look to change behaviour, for example in getting government to amend legislation?
In reputational terms, I feel PR sets itself up to fail in many situations if it claims to be able to keep or change reputation. It should certainly be able to influence strategic decisions in relation to their reputational impact - but others have a real impact on reputation that is beyond the influence of PR.
PR’s ability to help organisations facilitate communications and relationships with key publics should be recognised, alongside a role in managing risk in relation to issues that could become a reputation-affecting crisis.
Anyway, I think that many of those searching for the difference between marketing and PR are probably students - who should be encouraged to reflect more deeply than being offered an easy solution by kind bloggers.
Wednesday, October 31st, 2007 at 2:36 pm
Hi Heather - thanks for the well-argued comment, far more reasoned than my attempt at a quick-fit definition.
The more I think about the difference between marketing and PR, the more I struggle.
As you’ve identified there’s so many outcomes that are common to the two professions, that I wonder what the fundamental differences are?
If there aren’t any fundamental differences, are we seeing a further convergence of the two professions?
And as for the students, I suspect you’re right. I even get emails asking about this topic!