<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Using Google Analytics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.simonwakeman.com/2005/11/15/using-google-analytics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.simonwakeman.com/2005/11/15/using-google-analytics/</link>
	<description>public sector communications and marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 14:41:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.simonwakeman.com/2005/11/15/using-google-analytics/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2006 01:11:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dev.simonwakeman.com/?p=36#comment-9</guid>
		<description>Be interested to see how you got on. . . I too have been using both packages side by side for a full month.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I really like Analytics but it is showing roughly 50% less visitors/day than fast stats despite my repeated checks for IP filtering and the .js working on all pages.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
How do your numbers compare?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Which is most accurate?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Be interested to see how you got on. . . I too have been using both packages side by side for a full month.</p>
<p>I really like Analytics but it is showing roughly 50% less visitors/day than fast stats despite my repeated checks for IP filtering and the .js working on all pages.</p>
<p>How do your numbers compare?</p>
<p>Which is most accurate?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.329 seconds -->
